Search found 9 matches
- Thu Jul 07, 2022 4:53 am
- Forum: SW General
- Topic: SW 2022 SP3 - First Thoughts
- Replies: 101
- Views: 16470
Re: SW 2022 SP3 - First Thoughts
I posted this in a different thread but it probably fits in here better: I have now installed the early release of the Sw SP3 and the Pack and Go seems to be working fine. The main issue I had was that P&G was not able to: - renaming multiple 20+ file names (with the 'select/replace' function) -...
- Wed Jul 06, 2022 12:16 pm
- Forum: SW General
- Topic: SW 2022 SP3 - First Thoughts
- Replies: 101
- Views: 16470
Re: SW 2022 SP3 - First Thoughts
HI Bradfordzzz Do you want me to try a particular file/ mirror function? I have the SP3 early release and a very simple mock-up showed no issues mirroring a feature in a part and a part in an assembly. I think we need to have the Mission Impossible them song play whenever we open Solidworks. at leas...
- Tue Jul 05, 2022 6:49 am
- Forum: SW General
- Topic: How is everyone liking Solidworks 2022 SP1?
- Replies: 181
- Views: 30083
Re: How is everyone liking Solidworks 2022 SP1?
Hi All, I have now installed the early release of the Sw SP3 and the Pack and Go seems to be working fine. The main issue I had was that P&G was not able to: - renaming multiple 20+ file names (with the 'select/replace' function) - replacing various 'save to folder' locations as they were not ch...
- Fri Jul 01, 2022 4:27 am
- Forum: SW General
- Topic: How is everyone liking Solidworks 2022 SP1?
- Replies: 181
- Views: 30083
Re: How is everyone liking Solidworks 2022 SP1?
Hi Alex, Yes, that works to an extent. Most of the files for which I do not want to have a suffix are 3rd party files and the labelling is not always consistent. Therefore, I don't benefit from mass relabeling. Thank you though. I thought to remember that past versions of SW actually had a tick opti...
- Fri Jul 01, 2022 4:23 am
- Forum: SW General
- Topic: How is everyone liking Solidworks 2022 SP1?
- Replies: 181
- Views: 30083
Re: How is everyone liking Solidworks 2022 SP1?
I just received confirmation from Solidworks directly that this issue will be resolved in SP3, which is to be expected soon.
I might get my hand on an early release version to test if this will actually be the case.
I'll keep you posted.
I might get my hand on an early release version to test if this will actually be the case.
I'll keep you posted.
- Thu Jun 30, 2022 11:41 am
- Forum: SW General
- Topic: How is everyone liking Solidworks 2022 SP1?
- Replies: 181
- Views: 30083
Re: How is everyone liking Solidworks 2022 SP1?
That's great, glad to hear. Does anyone know by any chance if it is possible to give a suffix to only some selected files of the P&G? I noticed that this solution works intermittently if you have to remove the suffix from a large number of files that should maintain their original name and also ...
- Tue Jun 28, 2022 5:38 am
- Forum: SW General
- Topic: How is everyone liking Solidworks 2022 SP1?
- Replies: 181
- Views: 30083
Re: How is everyone liking Solidworks 2022 SP1?
I had another play around with Pack and Go. It seems that there is a bug so you have to apply a suffix. By doing so, I seem to have no issue with P&G. I keep my working files with no suffix now and any P&G backup gets its own suffix. We just do it manually, instead of relying on the automati...
- Wed Jun 22, 2022 5:02 am
- Forum: SW General
- Topic: How is everyone liking Solidworks 2022 SP1?
- Replies: 181
- Views: 30083
Re: How is everyone liking Solidworks 2022 SP1?
Update: after speaking to an SW service provider and support hotline, I solved my pack-and-go issue. SP02 update helped but also breaking the link to all .stp files that I have in my SW assembly. The initial error message in pack and go I got was that there were multiple files that were named the sa...
- Fri Jun 17, 2022 1:12 pm
- Forum: SW General
- Topic: How is everyone liking Solidworks 2022 SP1?
- Replies: 181
- Views: 30083
Re: How is everyone liking Solidworks 2022 SP1?
Hi Bradfordzzz, I always thought I am doing something wrong with pack and go and now found this forum that clearly proves it's a bug. What is your workaround if I may ask? I do not use a PDM so I rely on creating revisions via pack and go. It creates a new folder with all the parts I need and chose ...