Steen Winther wrote: ↑Wed May 05, 2021 8:43 pm
@matt There may be an issue with this page because most images are blank except this one which shows up as an abstract painting....!
It is actually quite pretty
File-corruption on the server???
Yeah, this was an old issue we had early on. I'm getting those cleaned up.
Steen Winther wrote: ↑Wed May 05, 2021 9:20 pm
What bothers me is that I can create two individual bodies without issues, but I can't merge them into one body:
Which illustrates why this is more of a software coding issue than it is a theoretical impossibility issue. It's nothing more than deciding how you want to deal with the numbers, make it a gap or make it material. Making it a gap or boundary makes the most sense. Two parts put together with a boundary with zero space between would be the same as "Zero thickness" where a boundary was placed at the point of the ZTG.
Q: What is another way of describing zero-thickness geometry?
A: Hole
In other words, zero-thickness geometry is an oxymoron, which says nothing about CAD functionality. There are good reasons why we spend so much time pleading for this functionality, but the concept is nonsense.
Steen Winther wrote: ↑Wed May 05, 2021 8:43 pm
@matt There may be an issue with this page because most images are blank except this one which shows up as an abstract painting....!
It is actually quite pretty
File-corruption on the server???
I thought it was one of John's Pictures.
You ˹alone˺ we worship and You ˹alone˺ we ask for help.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_wire
Carbon Nanotubes are one molecule wide. Atomized silver can be absorbed into a carbon nanotube to create a 1-atom wide nanowire, as accidentally discovered two months ago by university researchers. These 1D wires are intended for use in nanoarrays.
1-dimensional objects do exist, and you can google that term for lots more than you probably care to understand. That fact is irrelevant to CAD design, as it is not intended to apply to a quantum scale.