A place FOR CAD users BY CAD users
https://cadforum-net.dezignstuff.com/
Beautifully put. It could be concidered a form of fraud in a way, but it would be hard to prove. As I spoke of in another thread, it's basically just articles to try and boost their stocks.rumpus wrote: ↑Mon Aug 22, 2022 9:15 pm Yeah... everybody has a story. Those writers obviously get paid, probably a couple hundred bucks per article. I wrote for the org at one time, and it wasn't worth my time. So are you seeing what they would write for a buck, or are you getting an honest end users opinion? Guarantee you these guys don't actually have any experience with 3DX. You might find some surprises if you look closely. And its interesting how you can spin words... I don't see any honestly glowing endorsements. This is how you develop a reputation for marketing dishonesty.
I still can't believe they do not have tags for official Dassault employees over there. It's been what, a year and a half since the forced transition from the forum to the Platform? You'd think they'd want to make sure people know who to address their question to. Seems like it's pretty much the opposite, "Let's all hide in the crowd and let the crowd answer for us, so we don't have to take the blame if the crowd's wrong"AngryPictureDrawer2 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 23, 2022 11:18 am I thought it was fun to check out who was liking those writers work and more times than not it was the same five people who also put out weekly articles. it was an entertaining diversion for a moment, some claim they work to SW, others had it hidden sort of.
https://r1132100503382-eu1-3dswym.3dexp ... JzxPfRwqNA
Oh, ok, whew! I thought you all were calling me out for writing a couple articles on engineersrule.com. I wrote one on the "platform" idea, and one on "single source of truth". The site is sponsored by DS. I've written elsewhere about the "platform" from other points of view. I tried to be objective without being negative, if that makes any sense. These days I'm more a writer than anything else, and have to be able to parse ideas into constituent parts. An idea can be good while the execution is poor, or the approach is wrong. The problem is that yes, they do pay for the articles, and more than they did a few years ago. @TooTallToby actually noticed the articles a couple of weeks ago, and spotted me dancing a little bit.AlexLachance wrote: ↑Tue Aug 23, 2022 1:47 pm https://r1132100503382-eu1-3dswym.3dexp ... JzxPfRwqNA
https://r1132100503382-eu1-3dswym.3dexp ... nrnWfJi1KQ
https://r1132100503382-eu1-3dswym.3dexp ... pkMA-rRccg
3 quick ones that represent well what he speaks of.
image.png
We would never speak indirectly in such a way about you Matt, or at least I wouldn't. I have too much respect for you. It's more the principle of paying a bunch of people to create articles and circle jerk themselves about how good the articles are that is kind of... stupid..?matt wrote: ↑Tue Aug 23, 2022 2:30 pm Oh, ok, whew! I thought you all were calling me out for writing a couple articles on engineersrule.com. I wrote one on the "platform" idea, and one on "single source of truth". The site is sponsored by DS. I've written elsewhere about the "platform" from other points of view. I tried to be objective without being negative, if that makes any sense. These days I'm more a writer than anything else, and have to be able to parse ideas into constituent parts. An idea can be good while the execution is poor, or the approach is wrong. The problem is that yes, they do pay for the articles, and more than they did a few years ago. @TooTallToby actually noticed the articles a couple of weeks ago, and spotted me dancing a little bit.
The "platform" is an old idea that we thought we got rid of in the 1990s. "Best in class", right? Well, that worked until the mom & pop software makers started snowballing into something bigger. Now they sing a different tune. One software conglomerate has found a way to join platform with best in class. They are developing an open platform, which allows everyone else to participate in developing for the platform. Not a closed platform. Think Apple (authoritarian evil) vs Google (slightly more palatably democratic evil).
There should be a "up" button to keep those $hit afloat.AngryPictureDrawer2 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 23, 2022 2:46 pm the other 10% seemed to be people who couldn't get the experience they paid for and wanted a refund
That's probably because they're some of the few people who can find the articles.AngryPictureDrawer2 wrote: ↑Mon Aug 22, 2022 7:24 pm Has anyone else noticed the shear VOLUME of article writers SW has for the Swamp?
its like ever group or home or whatever they have has at least 5-7 writers that complement each other for their articles.
Amazing, I wonder how much that costs.
I would read any article you post, I however find it difficult to imagine them, SW, intentionally and knowingly, pay YOU.Frederick_Law wrote: ↑Thu Aug 25, 2022 10:12 am Well, we should write some and get paid.
To sponsor this forum
That's hilarious! Yes, you should do that. And we should all go over there and up vote the entry.Frederick_Law wrote: ↑Fri Aug 26, 2022 8:14 am I'll slip in a few IV screenshot and see if they notice LOL
@Glenn Schroeder,Glenn Schroeder wrote: ↑Wed Aug 24, 2022 7:50 am That's probably because they're some of the few people who can find the articles.
One mathematical definition of infinity = 1/0mattpeneguy wrote: ↑Fri Aug 26, 2022 10:05 am @Glenn Schroeder,
It's very simple to find things over there....You just need 2 things:
1. image.png
2. An infinite amount of time.
Equation is great in IV.mattpeneguy wrote: ↑Fri Aug 26, 2022 9:34 am That's hilarious! Yes, you should do that. And we should all go over there and up vote the entry.
May I suggest something on the way IV handles equations? I watched a video a few years back and it seemed that IV was much more robust, but that was just my take away.